Login required to View Regulations

Sign In or Register Now.  Registration is fast and free!

 
§100.3 — Determination of penalty amount; regular assessment.
 
(a)
General.
 
(1)
Except as provided in §100.5(e), the operator of any mine in which a violation occurs of a mandatory health or safety standard or who violates any other provision of the Mine Act, as amended, shall be assessed a civil penalty of not more than $88,354. Each occurrence of a violation of a mandatory safety or health standard may constitute a separate offense. The amount of the proposed civil penalty shall be based on the criteria set forth in sections 105(b) and 110(i) of the Mine Act. These criteria are:
 
(i)
The appropriateness of the penalty to the size of the business of the operator charged;
 
(ii)
The operator's history of previous violations;
 
(iii)
Whether the operator was negligent;
 
(iv)
The gravity of the violation;
 
(v)
The demonstrated good faith of the operator charged in attempting to achieve rapid compliance after notification of a violation; and
 
(vi)
The effect of the penalty on the operator's ability to continue in business.
 
(2)
A regular assessment is determined by first assigning the appropriate number of penalty points to the violation by using the appropriate criteria and tables set forth in this section. The total number of penalty points will then be converted into a dollar amount under the penalty conversion table in paragraph (g) of this section. The penalty amount will be adjusted for demonstrated good faith in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section.
 
(b)
The appropriateness of the penalty to the size of the business of the operator charged. The appropriateness of the penalty to the size of the mine operator's business is calculated by using both the size of the mine cited and the size of the mine's controlling entity. The size of coal mines and their controlling entities is measured by coal production. The size of metal and nonmetal mines and their controlling entities is measured by hours worked. The size of independent contractors is measured by the total hours worked at all mines. Penalty points for size are assigned based on Tables I to V. As used in these tables, the terms “annual tonnage” and “annual hours worked” mean coal produced and hours worked in the previous calendar year. In cases where a full year of data is not available, the coal produced or hours worked is prorated to an annual basis. This criterion accounts for a maximum of 25 penalty points.

Table I — Size of Coal Mine

Annual Tonnage of MinePenalty Points
0 to 7,5001
Over 7,500 to 10,0002
Over 10,000 to 15,0003
Over 15,000 to 20,0004
Over 20,000 to 30,0005
Over 30,000 to 50,0006
Over 50,000 to 70,0007
Over 70,000 to 100,0008
Over 100,000 to 200,0009
Over 200,000 to 300,00010
Over 300,000 to 500,00011
Over 500,000 to 700,00012
Over 700,000 to 1,000,00013
Over 1,000,000 to 2,000,00014
Over 2,000,00015

Table II — Size of Controlling Entity-Coal Mine

Annual TonnagePenalty Points
0 to 50,0001
Over 7,500 to 10,0002
Over 50,000 to 100,0003
Over 100,000 to 200,0004
Over 200,000 to 300,0005
Over 300,000 to 500,0006
Over 500,000 to 700,0007
Over 700,000 to 1,000,0008
Over 1,000,000 to 3,000,0009
Over 3,000,000 to 10,000,00010

Table III — Size of Metal/Nonmetal Mine

Annual Hours Worked at MinePenalty Points
0 to 5,0000
Over 5,000 to 10,0001
Over 10,000 to 20,0002
Over 20,000 to 30,0003
Over 30,000 to 50,0004
Over 50,000 to 100,0005
Over 100,000 to 200,0006
Over 200,000 to 300,0007
Over 300,000 to 500,0008
Over 500,000 to 700,0009
Over 700,000 to 1,000,00010
Over 1,000,000 to 1,500,00011
Over 1,500,000 to 2,000,00012
Over 2,000,000 to 3,000,00012
Over 3,000,000 to 5,000,00014
Over 5,000,00015

Table IV — Size of Controlling Entity — Metal/Nonmetal Mine

Annual Hous WorkedPenalty Points
0 to 50,000
Over 50,000 to 100,0001
Over 100,000 to 200,0002
Over 200,000 to 300,0003
Over 300,000 to 500,0004
Over 500,000 to 1,000,0005
Over 1,000,000 to 2,000,0006
Over 2,000,000 to 3,000,0007
Over 3,000,000 to 5,000,0008
Over 5,000,000 to 10,000,0009
Over 10,000,00010

Table V — Size of Independent Contractor

Annual Hours Worked at all MinesPenalty Points
0 to 5,0000
Over 5,000 to 7,0002
Over 7,000 to 10,0004
Over 10,000 to 20,0006
Over 20,000 to 30,0008
Over 30,000 to 50,00010
Over 50,000 to 70,00012
Over 70,000 to 100,00014
Over 100,000 to 200,00016
Over 200,000 to 300,00018
Over 300,000 to 500,00020
Over 500,000 to 700,00022
Over 700,000 to 1,000,00024
Over 1,000,00025
 
(c)
History of previous violations. An operator's history of previous violations is based on both the total number of violations and the number of repeat violations of the same citable provision of a standard in a preceding 15-month period. Only assessed violations that have been paid or finally adjudicated, or have become final orders of the Commission will be included in determining an operator's history. The repeat aspect of the history criterion in paragraph (c)(2) of this section applies only after an operator has received 10 violations or an independent contractor operator has received 6 violations.
 
(1)
Total number of violations. For mine operators, penalty points are assigned on the basis of the number of violations per inspection day (VPID)(Table VI). Penalty points are not assigned for mines with fewer than 10 violations in the specified history period. For independent contractors, penalty points are assigned on the basis of the total number of violations at all mines (Table VII). This aspect of the history criterion accounts for a maximum of 25 penalty points.

Table VI — History of Previous Violations — Mine Operations

Mine Operator's Overall History of Violations Per Inspection DayPenalty Points
0 to 0.30
Over 0.3 to 0.52
Over 0.5 to 0.75
Over 0.7 to 0.98
Over 0.9 to 1.110
Over 1.1 to 1.312
Over 1.3 to 1.514
Over 1.5 to 1.716
Over 1.7 to 1.919
Over 1.9 to 2.122
Over 2.125

Table VII — History of Previous Violations — Independent Contractors

Independent Contractor's Overall History of Number of ViolationsPenalty Points
0 to 50
61
72
83
94
105
116
127
138
149
1510
1611
1712
1813
1914
2015
2116
2217
2318
2419
2520
2621
2722
2823
2924
Over 2925
 
(2)
Repeat violations of the same standard. Repeat violation history is based on the number of violations of the same citable provision of a standard in a preceding 15-month period. For coal and metal and nonmetal mine operators with a minimum of six repeat violations, penalty points are assigned on the basis of the number of repeat violations per inspection day (RPID) (Table VIII). For independent contractors, penalty points are assigned on the basis of the number of violations at all mines (Table IX). This aspect of the history criterion accounts for a maximum of 20 penalty points (Table VIII).

Table VIII — History of Previous Violations — Repeat Violations for Coal and Metal and Nonmetal Operators with a Minimum of 6 Repeat Violations

Number of Repeat Violations Per Inspection DayFinal Rule Penalty Points
0 to 0.10
Over 0.1 to 0.0151
Over 0.015 to 0.022
Over 0.02 to 0.0253
Over 0.025 to 0.034
Over 0.03 to 0.045
Over 0.04 to 0.056
Over 0.05 to 0.067
Over 0.06 to 0.088
Over 0.08 to 0.109
Over 0.10 to 0.1210
Over 0.12 to 0.1411
Over 0.14 to 0.1612
Over 0.16 to 0.1813
Over 0.18 to 0.2014
Over 0.20 to 0.2515
Over 0.25 to 0.3016
Over 0.30 to 0.4017
Over 0.40 to 0.5018
Over 0.50 to 1.0019
Over 1.0020

Table IX — History of Previous Violations — Repeat Violations for Independent Contractors

Number of Repeat Violations of the Same StandardFinal Rule Penalty Points
5 or Fewer0
62
74
86
98
1012
1214
1316
1418
More than 1420
 
(d)
Negligence. Negligence is conduct, either by commission or omission, which falls below a standard of care established under the Mine Act to protect miners against the risks of harm. Under the Mine Act, an operator is held to a high standard of care. A mine operator is required to be on the alert for conditions and practices in the mine that affect the safety or health of miners and to take steps necessary to correct or prevent hazardous conditions or practices. The failure to exercise a high standard of care constitutes negligence. The negligence criterion assigns penalty points based on the degree to which the operator failed to exercise a high standard of care. When applying this criterion, MSHA considers mitigating circumstances which may include, but are not limited to, actions taken by the operator to prevent or correct hazardous conditions or practices. This criterion accounts for a maximum of 50 penalty points, based on conduct evaluated according to Table X.

Table X — Negligence

CategoriesPenalty Points
No Negligence
(The operator exercised diligence and could not have known of the violative condition or practice.)
0
Low Negligence
(The operator knew or should have known of the violative condition or practice, but there are considerable mitigating circumstances)
10
Moderate Negligence
(The operator knew or should have known of the violative condition or practice, and there are no mitigating circumstances)
20
High Negligence
(The operator knew or should have known of the violative practice, and there are no mitigating circumstances)
35
Reckless Disregard
(The operator displayed conduct which exhibits the absence of the slightest degree of care.)
50
 
(e)
Gravity. Gravity is an evaluation of the seriousness of the violation. This criterion accounts for a maximum of 88 penalty points, as derived from the Tables XI through XIII. Gravity is determined by the likelihood of the occurrence of the event against which a standard is directed; the severity of the illness or injury if the event has occurred or was to occur; and the number of persons potentially affected if the event has occurred or were to occur.

Table XI — Gravity: Likelihood

Likelihood of OccurrencePenalty Points
No Likelihood0
Unlikely10
Reasonably Likely30
Highly Likely40
Occurred50

Table XII — Gravity: Severity

Severity of Injury or Illness if the Event has Occurred or were to occurPenalty Points
No lost work days
(All occupational injuries and illnesses as defined in 30 CFR Part 50 except those listed below)
0
Lost work days or restricted duty
(Any injury or illness which would cause the injured or ill person to lose one full day of work or more after the day of the injury or illness, or which would cause on full day or more of restricted duty.)
5
Permanently disabling
(Any injury or illness which would be liekly to result in the total or partial loss of the use of any member or function of the body)
10
Fatal
(Any work-related injury or illness resulting in death, or which has a reasonable potential to cause death.)
20

Table XIII — Gravity: Persons Potentially Affected

Number of persons potentially affected if the event has occurred or were to occurPenalty Points
00
11
22
34
46
58
610
712
814
916
10 or more18
 
(f)
Demonstrated good faith of the operator in abating the violation. This criterion provides a 10% reduction in the penalty amount of a regular assessment where the operator abates the violation within the time set by the inspector.
 
(g)
Penalty conversion table. The penalty conversion table is used to convert the total penalty points to a dollar amount.

Table 14 to Paragraph (g) — Penalty Conversion Table

PointsPenalty ($)
60 or fewer$164
61179
62192
63210
64227
65246
66266
67289
68312
69339
70365
71397
72432
73468
74504
75547
76595
77641
78696
79755
80818
81886
82957
831,039
841,124
851,220
861,321
871,430
881,550
891,679
901,819
911,970
922,132
932,311
942,504
952,712
962,938
973,180
983,448
993,735
1004,047
1014,383
1024,748
1035,143
1045,571
1056,037
1066,538
1077,083
1087,673
1098,313
1109,005
1119,752
11210,567
11311,447
11412,401
11513,433
11614,551
11715,765
11817,077
11918,500
12020,039
12121,711
12223,515
12325,477
12427,599
12529,893
12632,386
12735,084
12838,005
12941,171
13044,601
13148,316
13252,338
13356,698
13461,221
13565,741
13670,266
13774,785
13879,309
13983,830
140 or more88,354
 
(h)
The effect of the penalty on the operator's ability to continue in business. MSHA presumes that the operator's ability to continue in business will not be affected by the assessment of a civil penalty. The operator may, however, submit information to the District Manager concerning the financial status of the business. If the information provided by the operator indicates that the penalty will adversely affect the operator's ability to continue in business, the penalty may be reduced.

[72 FR 13635, Mar. 22, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 7209, Feb. 7, 2008; 81 FR 43455, July 1, 2016; 82 FR 5383, Jan. 18, 2017; 83 FR 14, Jan. 2, 2018; 84 FR 219, Jan. 23, 2019; 85 FR 2299, Jan. 15, 2020]

   Reason: