Login required to View Regulations

Sign In or Register Now.  Registration is fast and free!

 
§40.159 — What does the MRO do when a drug test result is invalid?
 
(a)
As the MRO, when the laboratory reports that the test result is an invalid result, you must do the following:
 
(1)
Discuss the laboratory results with a certifying scientist to determine if the primary specimen should be tested at another HHS-certified laboratory. If the laboratory did not contact you as required by §§40.91(e) and 40.96(b), you must contact the laboratory.
 
(2)
If you and the laboratory have determined that no further testing is necessary, contact the employee and inform the employee that the specimen was invalid. In contacting the employee, use the procedures set forth in §40.131.
 
(3)
After explaining the limits of disclosure (see §§40.135(d) and 40.327), you must determine if the employee has a medical explanation for the invalid result. You must inquire about the medications the employee may have taken.
 
(4)
If the employee gives an explanation that is acceptable, you must:
 
(i)
Place a check mark in the “Test Cancelled” box (Step 6) on Copy 2 of the CCF and enter “Invalid Result” and “direct observation collection not required” on the “Remarks” line.
 
(ii)
Report to the DER that the test is cancelled, the reason for cancellation, and that no further action is required unless a negative test result is required (i.e., pre-employment, return-to-duty, or follow-up tests).
 
(iii)
If a negative test result is required and the medical explanation concerns a situation in which the employee has a permanent or long-term medical condition that precludes him or her from providing a valid specimen, as the MRO, you must follow the procedures outlined at §40.160 for determining if there is clinical evidence that the individual is an illicit drug user.
 
(5)
If the employee is unable to provide an explanation and/or a valid prescription for a medication that interfered with the immunoassay test but denies having adulterated the specimen, you must:
 
(i)
Place a check mark in the “Test Cancelled” box (Step 6) on Copy 2 of the CCF and enter “Invalid Result” and “direct observation collection required” on the “Remarks” line.
 
(ii)
Report to the DER that the test is cancelled, the reason for cancellation, and that a second collection must take place immediately under direct observation. Recommend to the employer that an alternate specimen should be collected if practicable (e.g., oral fluid, if the specimen was urine).
 
(iii)
Instruct the employer to ensure that the employee has the minimum possible advance notice that he or she must go to the collection site.
 
(6)
When the test result is invalid because pH is greater than or equal to 9.0 but less than or equal to 9.5 and the employee has no other medical explanation for the pH, you should consider whether there is evidence of elapsed time and increased temperature that could account for the pH value.
 
(i)
You are authorized to consider the temperature conditions that were likely to have existed between the time of collection and transportation of the specimen to the laboratory, and the length of time between the specimen collection and arrival at the laboratory.
 
(ii)
You may talk with the collection site and laboratory to discuss time and temperature issues, including any pertinent information regarding specimen storage.
 
(iii)
If you determine that time and temperature account for the pH value, you must cancel the test and take no further action, as provided at paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
 
(iv)
If you determine that time and temperature fail to account for the pH value, you must cancel the test and direct another collection under direct observation, as provided at paragraph (a)(5) of this section.
 
(b)
You may only report an invalid test result when you are in possession of a legible copy of Copy 1 of the CCF. In addition, you must have Copy 2 of the CCF, a legible copy of it, or any other copy of the CCF containing the employee's signature.
 
(c)
If the employee admits to having adulterated or substituted the specimen, you must, on the same day, write and sign your own statement of what the employee told you. You must then report a refusal to test in accordance with §40.163.
 
(d)
If the employee admits to using a drug, you must, on the same day, write and sign your own statement of what the employee told you. You must then report that admission to the DER for appropriate action under DOT Agency regulations. This test will be reported as cancelled with the reason noted.
 
(e)
If the employee's recollection (required at paragraph (a)(5) of this section) results in another invalid result for the same reason as reported for the first specimen, as the MRO, you must:
 
(1)
Review the CCF to ensure that there is documentation that the recollection was directly observed.
 
(2)
If the CCF review indicates that the recollection was directly observed as required, document that the employee had another specimen with an invalid result for the same reason.
 
(3)
Follow the recording and reporting procedures at (a)(4)(i) and (ii) of this section.
 
(4)
If a negative result is required (i.e., pre-employment, return-to-duty, or follow-up tests), follow the procedures at §40.160 for determining if there is clinical evidence that the individual is an illicit drug user.
 
(5)
If the recollection was not directly observed as required, do not report a result but again explain to the DER that there must be an immediate recollection under direct observation.
 
(f)
If the employee's recollection (required at paragraph (a)(5) of this section) results in another invalid result for a different reason than that reported for the first specimen, as the MRO, you must:
 
(1)
Review the CCF to ensure that there is documentation that the recollection was directly observed.
 
(2)
If the CCF review indicates that the recollection was directly observed as required, document that the employee had another specimen with an invalid result for a different reason.
 
(3)
As the MRO, you should not contact the employee to discuss the result, but rather direct the DER to conduct an immediate recollection under direct observation without prior notification to the employee.
 
(4)
If the CCF documentation indicates that the recollection was not directly observed as required, do not report a result but again explain to the DER that there must be an immediate recollection under direct observation.
 
(g)
If, as the MRO, you receive a laboratory invalid result in conjunction with a positive, adulterated, and/or substituted result and you verify any of those results as being a positive and/or refusal to test, you do not report the invalid result unless the split specimen fails to reconfirm the result(s) of the primary specimen.

[65 FR 79526, Dec. 19, 2000, as amended at 73 FR 35972, June 25, 2008; 75 FR 49863, Aug. 16, 2010; 88 FR 27646, May 2, 2023]

 
§40.159 — DOT Regulatory Guidance
 
Question 1: What does an MRO do when a drug test result is invalid due to "color discrepancy?"

Guidance: If "Invalid — Color difference" is the only result reported to you, you must follow the guidance of §40.159 by contacting the laboratory to obtain more specific information about the color difference between the specimens, and contacting the donor to obtain a legitimate explanation for the color difference. While there is no legitimate medical reason for anyone being able to provide a specimen that separates into two different colors when placed in two different bottles, the interview is necessary to determine appropriate follow-on action.

You must determine whether the donor has provided you with a legitimate explanation for the color difference (e.g., the collector used two separate voids for the collection), or not (e.g., no clue as to how the colors changed by the time the specimens reached the laboratory).

You must follow §40.159 for canceling the result, reporting the result to the employer, determining whether a recollection is necessary and, if so, should it be under direct observation.

If the laboratory has also reported to you that the specimen is positive, adulterated, or substituted, then you must process the results in accordance with §40.129-131. If you determine (i.e., verify) the final result to be positive, adulterated, or substituted, then no additional action is required by you due to the color difference. You must not direct the employee to take another test.

Notify the employer that the collector must receive "error correction training" as required by §40.33(f). The area of Part 40 in which the collector needs to be retrained is §40.65(a).

 
Question 2: During periods of hot weather, how may Medical Review Officers (MROs) handle laboratory results reported as invalid because of pH greater than or equal to 9.0 but less than or equal to 9.5?

Guidance: Part 40 requires an MRO to provide an employee the opportunity to present a medical explanation for an invalid test result, to include any related to pH.

  • If the employee provides an acceptable medical explanation, the MRO is authorized to cancel the test and take no further action.
  • If there is no acceptable medical explanation, the MRO will cancel the test and will notify the employer or Designated Employer Representative (DER) to direct another collection under direct observation.

The Department is aware of current research and studies offering evidence that, over time, heat may cause the pH to rise, typically into the range of 9.0 through 9.3, but not higher than 9.5. [See, for example, "Urine pH: the Effects of Time and Temperature after Collection," Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 31, October 2007.]

Consequently, when an employee has no other medical explanation for the pH in the 9.0 - 9.5 range, MROs should consider whether there is evidence of elapsed time and increased temperature that could account for the pH value.

In doing so, MROs are authorized to consider the following:

  • The temperature conditions that were likely to have existed between the time of collection and transportation of the specimen to the laboratory; and
  • The length of time between the specimen collection and arrival at the laboratory.

MROs may talk with the collection sites to discuss time and temperature issues, including any pertinent information regarding specimen storage.

If the MRO determines that time and temperature account for the pH value, the MRO is authorized to cancel the test and take no further action.

If the MRO determines that time and temperature fail to account for the pH value, the MRO is authorized cancel the test and direct another collection under direct observation.

   Reason: